This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/4] gdb: Remove register class specific layout names.
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Burgess <andrew dot burgess at embecosm dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:34:39 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gdb: Remove register class specific layout names.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <cover dot 1432163460 dot git dot andrew dot burgess at embecosm dot com> <90740f3ef5bac701c1653d469fcc9d34fb113517 dot 1432163460 dot git dot andrew dot burgess at embecosm dot com> <555D9A69 dot 3070409 at redhat dot com> <20150521113311 dot GI2880 at embecosm dot com>
On 05/21/2015 12:33 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> * Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> [2015-05-21 09:42:17 +0100]:
>
>> On 05/21/2015 12:17 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>>>
>>> Second there is already the command 'tui reg GROUP' command to set the
>>> displayed register set to GROUP, so making the layout command also
>>> control the register set feels like unnecessary overloading of the
>>> layout command.
>>
>> (A tangent: I was playing with this a bit now, and found it quite odd
>> that there's a "tui reg next" command here, but
>> no "tui reg previous"...)
>
> Indeed, this is on my list of things to look at next (unless you're
> already fixing it).
I'm not fixing it.
> You'll also notice, at least on x86-64 that if you use 'tui reg next'
> you get access to more register sets that are offered in the
> tab-completion mechanism. This too is something I plan to address in
> the next series.
Sounds all great, thanks!
--
Pedro Alves