This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v9 09/10] Validate symbol file using build-id
- From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Aleksandar Ristovski <ARistovski at qnx dot com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:21:27 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/10] Validate symbol file using build-id
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150621101644 dot GA12733 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <CADPb22TH5nfFSkCzW9cCiHuoJFAG+P5z=qZawgwGUgYQ5kfd5Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150623204702 dot GA2156 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <559D3749 dot 9010200 at redhat dot com> <20150712190921 dot GA8682 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20150712192911 dot GB12553 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <83vbdp8846 dot fsf at gnu dot org> <55A39439 dot 1090803 at redhat dot com> <20150713123835 dot GA2529 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <CADPb22TLu1FW=DXaECJv2fwR5er4ZLPQwm4o1kaCWDgC4HdtVQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:13:26 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
> So I'd be ok with just adding a simple note somewhere saying
> the option only applies to solibs at the moment and will
> eventually also apply to exes.
So the option is now called 'validate-build-id'.
Its description everywhere (NEWS+gdb.texinfo+'help set validate-build-id')
talks about shared library now. Is it OK this way or should it be changed?
Jan