This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello, On 08/03/2015 08:00 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Rebased this against master, in particular to make it compatible with the recent block_symbol additions. I don't have a GCC-4.1 compiler at hand, but I don't think I'm doing anything that may trigger build warnings. Pierre, maybe you want to confirm?
Well, I don't have easy access to one neither. ;-) I had a very quick look at your patch and it seems that all usage of block_symbol variables are dominated by at least one affectation (sym = lookup...), so I guess the problem Ulrich and Steve noticed should not arise here.
... except maybe in one place: in find_symbol_in_baseclass, the returned value is uninitialized if we don't enter the FOR loop (is that only possible in practice?). So what about providing {NULL, NULL} as an ininialization value to "sym", there?
-- Pierre-Marie de Rodat
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |