This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Cell multi-arch broken (Re: [PATCH 2/2] GNU/Linux: Stop using libthread_db/td_ta_thr_iter)


Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 08/26/2015 08:01 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
> >> (Sounds like the testsuite could be improved to better detect this.)
> > 
> > Yes, I think I'll at least set the test case to UNRESOLVED if
> > something unexpected happens while attempting to detect whether
> > we have Cell/B.E. hardware.
> 
> Sounds good to me.

I've pushed the testcase change (see patch below) ...

> >> find_one_thread makes use of td_ta_map_lwp2thr for the
> >> mapping we're after.
> >> On the GDB side, the equivalent is linux-thread-db.c:thread_from_lwp.
> > 
> > Ah, indeed that works for me.  The attached patch also fixes the
> > problem for me.
> > 
> 
> LGTM.

... and this linux-thread-db fix now.

Thanks,
Ulrich


testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* lib/cell.exp (skip_cell_tests): Report UNRESOLVED on unexpected
	failures to run the test program under GDB.

Index: binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/lib/cell.exp
===================================================================
--- binutils-gdb.orig/gdb/testsuite/lib/cell.exp
+++ binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/lib/cell.exp
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ gdb_caching_proc skip_cell_tests {
             set result 1
         }
         default {
-            verbose -log "\n$me Cell/B.E. hardware not detected (default case)"
+            unresolved "$me: unexpected failure"
             set result 1
         }
     }

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]