This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Block all async signals used by gdb when initializing Guile


> From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
> cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 10:22:11 -0700
> 
> --- a/gdb/guile/guile.c
> +++ b/gdb/guile/guile.c
> @@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ _initialize_guile (void)
>  #if HAVE_GUILE
>    {
>  #ifdef HAVE_SIGPROCMASK
> -    sigset_t sigchld_mask, prev_mask;
> +    sigset_t guile_init_mask, prev_mask;
>  #endif
>  
>      /* The Python support puts the C side in module "_gdb", leaving the Python
> @@ -867,9 +867,23 @@ _initialize_guile (void)
>         have SIGCHLD blocked.  PR 17247.
>         Really libgc and Guile should do this, but we need to work with
>         libgc 7.4.x.  */
> -    sigemptyset (&sigchld_mask);
> -    sigaddset (&sigchld_mask, SIGCHLD);
> -    sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK, &sigchld_mask, &prev_mask);
> +    sigemptyset (&guile_init_mask);
> +    sigaddset (&guile_init_mask, SIGCHLD);
> +    /* Also block other asynchronous signals used by GDB.  See event-top.c.
> +       Really we want to block every signal here except for those specifically
> +       used by Guile (e.g., GC threads), but this is safer for now.  */
> +    sigaddset (&guile_init_mask, SIGINT);
> +    sigaddset (&guile_init_mask, SIGTERM);
> +#ifdef SIGQUIT
> +    sigaddset (&guile_init_mask, SIGQUIT);
> +#endif
> +#ifdef SIGHUP
> +    sigaddset (&guile_init_mask, SIGHUP);
> +#endif
> +#ifdef SIGWINCH
> +    sigaddset (&guile_init_mask, SIGWINCH);
> +#endif
> +    sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK, &guile_init_mask, &prev_mask);
>  #endif

What about platforms that don't have sigprocmask, but do have SIGINT?
Don't we want to block SIGINT on those platforms?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]