This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: off-trunk gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp no longer PASSes [Re: [PATCH 0/2] fort_dyn_array: Enable basic Fortran dynamic array support]
- From: Keven Boell <keven dot boell at linux dot intel dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Keven Boell <keven dot boell at intel dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 08:31:47 +0100
- Subject: Re: off-trunk gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp no longer PASSes [Re: [PATCH 0/2] fort_dyn_array: Enable basic Fortran dynamic array support]
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1435754532-17922-1-git-send-email-keven dot boell at intel dot com> <20151027212831 dot GA3058 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20151027212954 dot GA19347 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20151028161907 dot GB4009 at adacore dot com> <20151029223619 dot GA12147 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net> <20151104214815 dot GR4009 at adacore dot com> <20151104220839 dot GA32720 at host1 dot jankratochvil dot net>
Hi Jan,
As you have already seen, only the basic Fortran VLA support was merged to the repository.
If you like I can also send the updated remaining Fortran VLA patches to the mailing list.
Keven
On 04.11.2015 23:08, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:48:15 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> Just to be sure - did we regress on something in the master branch?
>
> No.
>
>
>> Or is this just a regression on your branch when you only rely on
>> the changes that were made on master?
>
> Yes. While it is offtopic for upstream the current Fedora Rawhide
> (gdb-7.10.50.20151027-30.fc24) is now rebased on top of FSF GDB master not
> regressing the VLAs.
>
>
>> This allowed us to eventually get a good chunk of the work in, but as you
>> can see, some chunks appear to still be missing...
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gdb.git/tree/gdb-vla-intel.patch
>
> Although maybe there is some dead code/data in the patch, not sure.
>
>
> Jan
>