This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 12 Jan 2016 13:47, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 03:40 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Currently ports have to call SIM_AC_OPTION_INLINE explicitly in order > > to make the configure flag available. There's no real reason to not > > allow this flag for all ports, so move it to the common sim macro. > > This way we get standard behavior across all ports too. > > Before this patch was checked in (commit > 347fe5bb868b7383d4f6942894b31ecf1da6894e), when I built all-gdb for the > target mips-mti-linux-gnu, sim was not built. After the change, it does > get built i'm fairly certain that is not the case. that commit did not change the top level or the common sim configure at all, and the mips-specific change did not impact whether it was built. > (well, it tries to get built, it actually fails to build). that is a bug in the sim introduced by commit 8e394ffc7ab691eafcf276d7ae. i filed a bug for it here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19441 > I am not sure if this change in behavior, trying to build sim, is > intended or not. I can fix it easily enough by using --disable-sim on > my configure but I just wanted to check to see if this change was > intentional. I have never built sim for this target before because I > use qemu for testing it. I only use GNU sim for testing the mips*elf > targets. when building for mips*, you've always had to use --disable-sim in order to keep it from being built. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |