This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Remove field syscall_next_pc in struct gdbarch_tdep




On 01/14/2016 04:56 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> writes:

+static CORE_ADDR
+  arm_linux_get_next_pcs_syscall_next_pc (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
+					  CORE_ADDR pc);
+

Indent looks wrong on function signature line.

What is wrong?


Maybe it's only in the email ? but it seems like it's

static CORE_ADDR
  arm_linux_get_next_pcs_syscall_next_pc (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,

When it should be :

static CORE_ADDR
arm_linux_get_next_pcs_syscall_next_pc (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,


Regards,
Antoine


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]