Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm-tdep.c: Refactor displaced stepping relocation functions

[Simon Marchi <simon dot marchi at ericsson dot com>]

>> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> index 43b61c2..ef48a90 100644
>> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
>> @@ -7111,9 +7111,8 @@ thumb_copy_pop_pc_16bit (uint16_t insn1, struct arm_insn_reloc_data *data)
>>     return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> -static void
>> -thumb_process_displaced_16bit_insn (uint16_t insn1,
>> -				    struct arm_insn_reloc_data *data)
>> +static int
>> +arm_relocate_insn_thumb_16bit (uint16_t insn1, struct arm_insn_reloc_data *data)
>>   {
>>     unsigned short op_bit_12_15 = bits (insn1, 12, 15);
>>     unsigned short op_bit_10_11 = bits (insn1, 10, 11);
>> @@ -7202,9 +7201,7 @@ thumb_process_displaced_16bit_insn (uint16_t insn1,
>>         err = 1;
>>       }
>>
>> -  if (err)
>> -    internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
>> -		    _("thumb_process_displaced_16bit_insn: Instruction decode error"));
>> +  return err;
> 
> Should we keep this internal error message under a different context 
> instead of exporting just an error code? Maybe the error code should 
> trigger this internal error for GDB?

I am not sure I understand your comment. Given this call tree:

- arm_process_displaced_insn
  - arm_relocate_insn_arm
    ...
  - arm_relocate_insn_thumb_32bit
    ...
  - arm_relocate_insn_thumb_16bit
    ...

my patch makes it so that the arm_relocate_insn* functions return an error code, and
arm_process_displaced_insn calls internal_error if an error is returned.  Do you suggest
putting the internal_error calls in the arm_relocate_insn_* functions directly?