This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH 1/3] linux-record: Fix bad fall-through for pipe/pipe2


This patch added handling for some syscalls to linux-record.c:

  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-10/msg00452.html

But for both `pipe' and `pipe2' the patch lacks a statement after an
`if', such that the following `break' is interpreted as the `if'-body
instead.

This adds the missing (return-) statements for the conditionals.

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* linux-record.c (record_linux_system_call): Add missing return
	statements to handling of pipe and pipe2 syscalls.
---
 gdb/linux-record.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gdb/linux-record.c b/gdb/linux-record.c
index a40845a..2e86936 100644
--- a/gdb/linux-record.c
+++ b/gdb/linux-record.c
@@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ record_linux_system_call (enum gdb_syscall syscall,
       regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache, tdep->arg1, &tmpulongest);
       if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem ((CORE_ADDR) tmpulongest,
 					 tdep->size_int * 2))
+        return -1;
       break;
 
     case gdb_sys_times:
@@ -2312,6 +2313,7 @@ Do you want to stop the program?"),
       regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache, tdep->arg1, &tmpulongest);
       if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem ((CORE_ADDR) tmpulongest,
 					 tdep->size_int * 2))
+        return -1;
       break;
 
     case gdb_sys_inotify_init1:
-- 
2.5.0


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]