This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v3 30/34] [DOC] Document support for running interpreters on separate UI channels
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:03:24 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 30/34] [DOC] Document support for running interpreters on separate UI channels
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1462538104-19109-1-git-send-email-palves at redhat dot com> <1462538104-19109-31-git-send-email-palves at redhat dot com> <83r3dffidb dot fsf at gnu dot org> <8609fd35-50c8-41ca-88ea-758ebe4d2275 at redhat dot com> <49128714-b6f0-e901-9e11-49fd88583368 at redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:24:05 +0100
>
> On 05/26/2016 12:11 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On 05/06/2016 02:04 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >>> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> >>> Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 13:35:00 +0100
> >>>
> >>> +Although you may only choose a single interpreter at startup, it is
> >>> +possible to run an independent interpreter on a separate channel.
> >>
> >> "Channel"? What's that? Can we find a better word?
> >>
> >> No other comments to the doc part. Thanks.
> >
> > Thanks Eli. Here's an attempt at clarifying things, using
> > the same terminology already used in other related commands.
>
> Hi Eli. I'm not sure whether the "no other comments" remark
> meant pre-approval
It does.