This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] babeltrace compilation regression [Re: [PATCH] Avoid non-C++-enabled babeltrace versions]


On Sun, Jul 03 2016, Jan Kratochvil wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:24:23 +0200, Andreas Arnez wrote:
>> Thanks, pushed after adjusting the commit message.
>
> Since:
> 	commit 2d681be471cf8aff8f296cb7713c39e9aa4fc2bb
> 	Author: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 	Date:   Wed Apr 27 15:52:16 2016 +0200
> 	    Avoid non-C++-enabled babeltrace versions
> tested with:
> 	libbabeltrace-devel-1.2.4-4.fc24.x86_64
> 	libbabeltrace-devel-1.4.0-2.fc25.x86_64
> it can no longer build due to:
> 	configure:16435: gcc -o conftest -m64 -g3 -pipe -Wall -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret  -Werror  -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc  conftest.c -ldl -ldl -lncurses -lm -ldl  -lbabeltrace -lbabeltrace-ctf >&5
> 	conftest.c: In function 'main':
> 	conftest.c:208:7: error: 'pos' is a pointer; did you mean to use '->'?
>
> Have you tested that your line
> 	pos.type = BT_SEEK_BEGIN;
> with some libbabeltrace version or was that just a typo?

Phew, curious... this sure looks like a typo.  IIRC, I've tested that
GDB *builds*, but probably forgot to verify that the babeltrace
configure check actually succeeds.  Sorry about that.

--
Andreas


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]