This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA 0/3] Fix various bugs found by static analysis
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc at gmail dot com>, Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:30:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFA 0/3] Fix various bugs found by static analysis
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1475531646-18049-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <CAH=s-PM=1iJrBB_qAa_NY+yCNRJ1wDs135Aju_6J=aZW6A_Axg@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/04/2016 04:14 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> wrote:
>>
>> * PR 20654, incorrect code in java_value_print. Now that gcj has been
>> removed, I think it's probably better to simply remove the Java
>> language support. If this sounds ok, let me know, and I can provide
>> a patch.
>>
>
> I am fine to remove java language support in GDB, but I'd like to hear
> what other people think about this.
>
I'm fine with removing gcj support, but then again I never really
needed it personally.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves