This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Fix mismatched struct vs class tags.
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 03:58:11 PM Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2016-11-23 15:06, John Baldwin wrote:
> > The 'collection_list' and 'number_or_range_parser' types were converted
> > from structs to classes, but some code still used 'struct'. Fix all
> > references to use 'class' which fixes -Wmismatched-tags warnings issued
> > by clang.
>
> Whjen using the type in a parameter or variable declaration, should we
> simply drop the keyword?
>
> For example:
>
> - struct collection_list *collect;
> + collection_list *collect;
>
> That's the approach I took in my upcoming C++ patches, so I hope it's ok
> :). I have also dropped the "enum" keyword when possible.
Hmm. I don't see anything about this in the GCC C++ language conventions,
so I will have to defer to others as far as what is the desired style here?
(And we should document whatever style is chosen)
--
John Baldwin