This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Introduce "gdb/configure.nat" (and delete "gdb/config/*/*.mh" files)
- From: Simon Marchi <simon dot marchi at ericsson dot com>
- To: John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd dot org>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: Simon Marchi <simon dot marchi at polymtl dot ca>, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>, Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 13:00:37 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce "gdb/configure.nat" (and delete "gdb/config/*/*.mh" files)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: redhat.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;redhat.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
- References: <20170425202309.15771-1-sergiodj@redhat.com> <f891a53a78673a2ca30f15f25130ef30@polymtl.ca> <3544696.meYI8VJtXZ@ralph.baldwin.cx>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On 17-05-02 10:21 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> I had a similar thought about FreeBSD, FWIW. I wasn't sure if we wanted to
> wait for a followup to do that so that for this commit you could directly
> compare the old foo.mh file to a new clause in configure.nat as a way to
> check for any typos in case there is a regression reported in the future.
> You could perhaps include a second patch as a followup in a single series to
> add a host clause, but I think the intermediate step as its own commit has
> some merit.
Yes, I completely agree.