This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Simplify regcache_cpy and remove regcache::cpy_no_passthrough


Nowadays, regcache_cpy is used where src is read-only and dst is not
read-only, so the regcache_cpy can be simplified to handle this case only.
As a result, regcache::cpy_no_passthrough, which is about two read-only
regcache copy, is no longer used, remove it as well.

Regression tested on x86_64-linux, both native and gdbserver.

gdb:

2017-06-27  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>

	* regcache.c (regcache_cpy): Simplify it.
	(regcache::cpy_no_passthrough): Remove it.
	* regcache.h (cpy_no_passthrough): Remove it.
---
 gdb/regcache.c | 31 ++-----------------------------
 gdb/regcache.h |  2 --
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/regcache.c b/gdb/regcache.c
index 7eeb737..e8f92d6 100644
--- a/gdb/regcache.c
+++ b/gdb/regcache.c
@@ -388,36 +388,9 @@ regcache_cpy (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
   gdb_assert (src != NULL && dst != NULL);
   gdb_assert (src->m_descr->gdbarch == dst->m_descr->gdbarch);
   gdb_assert (src != dst);
-  gdb_assert (src->m_readonly_p || dst->m_readonly_p);
+  gdb_assert (src->m_readonly_p && !dst->m_readonly_p);
 
-  if (!src->m_readonly_p)
-    regcache_save (dst, do_cooked_read, src);
-  else if (!dst->m_readonly_p)
-    dst->restore (src);
-  else
-    dst->cpy_no_passthrough (src);
-}
-
-/* Copy/duplicate the contents of a register cache.  Unlike regcache_cpy,
-   which is pass-through, this does not go through to the target.
-   Only values values already in the cache are transferred.  The SRC and DST
-   buffers must not overlap.  */
-
-void
-regcache::cpy_no_passthrough (struct regcache *src)
-{
-  gdb_assert (src != NULL);
-  gdb_assert (src->m_descr->gdbarch == m_descr->gdbarch);
-  /* NOTE: cagney/2002-05-17: Don't let the caller do a no-passthrough
-     move of data into a thread's regcache.  Doing this would be silly
-     - it would mean that regcache->register_status would be
-     completely invalid.  */
-  gdb_assert (m_readonly_p && src->m_readonly_p);
-
-  memcpy (m_registers, src->m_registers,
-	  m_descr->sizeof_cooked_registers);
-  memcpy (m_register_status, src->m_register_status,
-	  m_descr->sizeof_cooked_register_status);
+  dst->restore (src);
 }
 
 struct regcache *
diff --git a/gdb/regcache.h b/gdb/regcache.h
index b416d5e..03c042a 100644
--- a/gdb/regcache.h
+++ b/gdb/regcache.h
@@ -369,8 +369,6 @@ private:
 
   void restore (struct regcache *src);
 
-  void cpy_no_passthrough (struct regcache *src);
-
   enum register_status xfer_part (int regnum, int offset, int len, void *in,
 				  const void *out,
 				  decltype (regcache_raw_read) read,
-- 
1.9.1


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]