Re: [RFA v2 01/24] Introduce and use ui_out_emit_table

[Simon Marchi <simon dot marchi at polymtl dot ca>]

On 2017-07-30 18:23, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > > > > > "Simon" == Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> writes:
>
> > > -  ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
> > > +    ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
>
> Simon> Shouldn't the scope just under this be indented as well?
>
> I think gdb is inconsistent about this, and my rule has always been 
> that
> whatever Emacs chooses is correct, since I think that's nearly GNU
> policy.  However, I will change it.  You may wish to fix the other
> instances.

Hmm, ok.  To me it would make sense to format it like for loops, since 
that's what it's replacing.

How does emacs format ALL_BREAKPOINTS with a single statement under it?

  ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
    foo (b);

or

  ALL_BREAKPOINTS (b)
  foo(b);

?