This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Regression on i686 host: gdb.base/floatn.exp: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available
- From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:12:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: Regression on i686 host: gdb.base/floatn.exp: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20171116190008.CD22CD80106@oc3748833570.ibm.com> <20171210150956.GA12583@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:09:56 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> 2400729ecfd2c7be8b18aeaa822fef5a4b503f8a is the first bad commit
> commit 2400729ecfd2c7be8b18aeaa822fef5a4b503f8a
> Author: Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed Nov 22 13:53:43 2017 +0100
> Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available
>
> FAIL: gdb.base/floatn.exp: the original value of f128 is 3.375
> FAIL: gdb.base/floatn.exp: try to change f128 to -3.375 with 'print f128=-3.375'
> FAIL: gdb.base/floatn.exp: the value of f128 is changed to 30.375
> FAIL: gdb.base/floatn.exp: the original value of c128 is 3.375 + 1 * I
I have seen now also there, that will be probably the same, I did not check
more:
-PASS: gdb.base/float128.exp: try to change f128 to -2.375 with 'print f128=-2.375l'
+FAIL: gdb.base/float128.exp: try to change f128 to -2.375 with 'print f128=-2.375l'
-PASS: gdb.base/float128.exp: the value of f128 is changed to 20.375
+FAIL: gdb.base/float128.exp: the value of f128 is changed to 20.375
+FAIL: gdb.base/float128.exp: print large128
Jan