Re: [PATCH] Use an std::vector for inline_states

[Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>]

Hi,

I remembered now that I forgot so point at something that I had wanted
to mention before.

It's that I think that this:

> +template <typename T>
> +T
> +unordered_remove (std::vector<T> &vec, typename std::vector<T>::iterator it)
> +{

won't work as is with gdb::def_vector/gdb::byte_vector, because the above
assumes std::vector has a single template parameter, while in reality it
has two.  

I think this can either be fixed by adding an allocator template parameter
to unordered_remove:

 template<typename T, typename A>
 void
 unordered_erase (std::vector<T, A> &v, 
                  typename std::vector<T, A>::iterator pos)

or by making the whole vector/container type a template like in
my example:

 template<typename Vector>
 void
 unordered_erase (Vector &v, typename Vector::iterator pos)

Thanks,
Pedro Alves