Re: [PATCH v2] Don't elide all inlined frames

[Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>]

On 05/14/2018 08:43 PM, Keith Seitz wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 08:55 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> I was thinking of this comment:
>>
>>     /* Breakpoint that caused the stop.  This is nullified if the
>>        breakpoint ends up being deleted.  See comments on
>>        `bp_location_at' above for why do we need this field instead of
>>        following the location's owner.  */
>>     struct breakpoint *breakpoint_at;
>>
>> and noticed that the code uses "s->breakpoint_at" and somehow misread
>> it as still following the breakpoint's location list.
> 
> Ah, yes, okay, your comments make much more sense now. ;-)

Yeah.  Also thanks for spotting that the earlier comment about not
following the locations of the breakpoint (since the may not be
enabled/inserted) still applied, and fixing the patch.  ;-)

This version is OK.  Please push.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves