This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 2018-05-24 11:53, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 05/22/2018 06:30 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:On 05/22/2018 04:37 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:Is there a reason not to make the remote_state object a simple field of remote_target, does it have to be a pointer? You would have to shuffle things around a little bit more, but it seems to work fine.Yeah, no reason other than struct remote_state not being complete yet when the field is defined in struct remote_target. I was thinking themoving would be done as follow up, to avoid even more churn mixed in with changes, very much like patch #4 started with a pointer and then patch #5moved to objects.Like this?
Yep, looks good!
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |