This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New FAIL gdb.base/float128.exp on ppc64le [Re: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available]

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:47:13 +0200
Subject: Re: New FAIL gdb.base/float128.exp on ppc64le [Re: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available]
References: <20180620125031.GA1067098@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20180620133905.5B634D80294@oc3748833570.ibm.com>

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:39:05 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Still maybe the testcase should contain such explanation of the FAIL.
> 
> Agreed.  The attached patch adds a comment, and also updates the FAIL
> message to indicate possible lack of MPFR support as reason.  Does
> this look good to you?

Yes, thanks.


Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New FAIL gdb.base/float128.exp on ppc64le [Re: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available]
  - From: Ulrich Weigand

References:
- Re: New FAIL gdb.base/float128.exp on ppc64le [Re: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: New FAIL gdb.base/float128.exp on ppc64le [Re: [RFC v2][2/2] Target FP: Make use of MPFR if available]
  - From: Ulrich Weigand

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]