This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA_v3 0/8] Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND'

From: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe dot waroquiers at skynet dot be>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew dot burgess at embecosm dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 22:38:23 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFA_v3 0/8] Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND'
References: <20180624183708.888-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <20180629122158.GH15881@embecosm.com> <1530303340.1512.15.camel@skynet.be>

On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 22:15 +0200, Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
> Whatever we take, we have to ensure that gdb.texinfo systematically use 
> it to identify a frame as shown by backtrace (#integer).
Note that in the online help, we have already some usages of level
speaking about frames.

So, all that taken into account, my preference would be to remove
the frame number wording,
and use frame level everywhere in the doc and online help : 
LEVEL seems more clear/intuitive than NUMBER or ID

But whatever choice is ok for me.

Philippe

References:
- [RFA_v3 0/8] Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND'
  - From: Philippe Waroquiers
- Re: [RFA_v3 0/8] Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND'
  - From: Andrew Burgess
- Re: [RFA_v3 0/8] Implement 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND'
  - From: Philippe Waroquiers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]