This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] GDB support for more powerpc registers on linux


-- 
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
On 08/16/2018 05:44 PM, Pedro Franco de Carvalho wrote:
> 
> Pedro Franco de Carvalho <pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> These are all the changes compared to V2, following the suggestions
>> there, and following the changes to linux-tdep.c:
>>
>> * Adapted "Zero-initialize linux note sections" due to recent changes
>>   from commit a616bb9450.
>>
>> * Added a comment to "Zero-initialize linux note sections"
>>
>> * Adapted all the four main patches that enable the registers
>>   (PPR/DSCR, TAR, EBB/PMU and HTM) to account for the changes from
>>   commit a616bb9450.
>>
>> * De-duplicated testcase names.  Changed a few of the test names so
>>   that they are environment-independent.  Fixed a few other minor
>>   issues with the testcases.
>>
>> * Changed one of the testcases for the HTM registers so that it
>>   XFAILs.  This testcase occasionally failed, possibly due to a kernel
>>   bug.
>>
>> * Fixed some of the formatting and const-correctness in "[PowerPC] Add
>>   support for HTM registers", in gdbserver/linux-ppc-low.c.
>>
>> * Added an item in the NEWS file on the last commit, indicating all
>>   the newly supported registers from this series.
> 
> Considering Ulrich had already approved the V2 patches, do these changes
> need to be re-approved, or can they be considered as obvious, and can I
> commit them?
> 

I was reading through the series as you sent this.  I sent a couple
comments to patches #12 and #14.  The remarks in #12 is something that can
always be addressed with this series already merged.  Re. the comments for #14,
it would be nice to go over the series and add missing intro comments to
functions, etc.  Otherwise, it all LGTM.  I only really skimmed
it for mechanics, since as you say Ulrich already reviewed it, and I'm
far from a Power expert anyway.

> I don't know if a NEWS item counts as obvious, but if not, I can submit
> it in a separate patch.

It's usually reviewed like other patches.  gdb/NEWS falls under
Eli's documentation maintainership.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]