This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] [PowerPC] Add support for HTM registers

From: Pedro Franco de Carvalho <pedromfc at linux dot ibm dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Cc: uweigand at de dot ibm dot com, edjunior at gmail dot com
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:50:19 -0300
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] [PowerPC] Add support for HTM registers
References: <20180815000608.26840-1-pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> <20180815000608.26840-13-pedromfc@linux.ibm.com> <540dad8e-f9a2-8173-a556-c919fbeeb43f@redhat.com>

Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

> I won't pretend to understand the above fully (not an Power expert),
> but the question I ended up with was, after all this, will the
> GDB-generated files end up looking like kernel-generated cores?
> Or are there plans for that?

They will end up looking different for this regset note section.  This
really seems like a kernel bug, which I'm hoping will get fixed.

--
Pedro Franco de Carvalho

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] [PowerPC] Add support for HTM registers
  - From: Pedro Franco de Carvalho

References:
- [PATCH v4 00/12] GDB support for more powerpc registers on linux
  - From: Pedro Franco de Carvalho
- [PATCH v4 12/12] [PowerPC] Add support for HTM registers
  - From: Pedro Franco de Carvalho
- Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] [PowerPC] Add support for HTM registers
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]