This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Proposal to revert the gnulib update patch
- From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>
- To: Jonah Graham <jonah at kichwacoders dot com>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:04:20 -0400
- Subject: Re: Proposal to revert the gnulib update patch
- References: <7a6dbc2fdb2323c35e981f93236f323e9d7c0b24-master-breakage@gdb-build> <E1fv3NX-0006MH-Tf@kwanyin.sergiodj.net> <87tvndm8je.fsf@redhat.com> <87a7p4lx9u.fsf@redhat.com> <87bm9kx3ht.fsf@tromey.com> <8736uwlura.fsf@redhat.com> <8736uwwucm.fsf@tromey.com> <87pny0k10s.fsf@redhat.com> <878t4mrssl.fsf@tromey.com> <CAPmGMvg9JUcO1JmV53W9iLFywGMC0=9AOOzLTXcLZ==gBoMKNQ@mail.gmail.com> <87y3ciytr7.fsf_-_@redhat.com> <CAPmGMvjskUcL8=piME+_m-vCL4_7A-hHq9pVtNx+vNNAssxdEA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, September 04 2018, Jonah Graham wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 01:46, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to hear your opinions.
>
> In the short term it would make my life easier. However at some point
> c11 should be allowed for GDB source. If gdb maintainers want to make
> that change now CDT will figure out how to manage.
I absolutely agree we should be moving to more recent standards *and*
compilers. My initial plan is to fix these two gnulib bugs, but I won't
be fully available this week and don't want to cause inconveniences to
other people who are compiling GDB with either an old compiler or on
mingw.
> I have put in a request to Eclipse Infrastructure to get a newer GCC
> on our build machines already:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=538538
Thanks, that is great.
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/