Re: [PATCH] x86-64: fix ZMM register state tracking

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich at suse dot com>]

>>> On 10.09.18 at 15:01, <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> On 2018-09-10 07:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com> 09/08/18 1:13 AM >>>
>>> Would it be possible to update or create a test to exercise that?
>>> arch-specific tests are in testsuite/gdb.arch.
>> 
>> I'm sure it would be possible, but while I was happy to invest the time 
>> to
>> fix the actual bug (because it affects work I'm doing), I'm afraid I 
>> don't have
>> the time to learn how gdb test cases are to be constructed (I'm 
>> familiar
>> only with the binutils / gas side of things).
> 
> I understand.  If you can provide:
> 
>   - a minimal source file (C + assembly in this case, I suppose)
>   - GDB commands to reproduce the bug
>   - actual and expected output

Attached. vzero.s is the source file used (no C file needed). gdb.log
is a transcript of a session with a broken gdb (the one installed on
the system), while gdb.txt is a transcript for the fixed one that I've
built myself.

> I can take care of turning it in a GDB test case.

Thanks.

Jan

Attachment: vzero.s
Description: Binary data

Attachment: gdb.log
Description: Binary data

Attachment: gdb.txt
Description: Text document