This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add native target for FreeBSD/riscv.

From: Jim Wilson <jimw at sifive dot com>
To: simon dot marchi at ericsson dot com
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb at freebsd dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Andrew Burgess <andrew dot burgess at embecosm dot com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:21:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add native target for FreeBSD/riscv.
References: <20180924205151.22217-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20180924205151.22217-5-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <bac099c5-9d7d-4c40-5242-00aa33fe2617@ericsson.com>

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 1:04 PM Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > --- a/gdb/NEWS
> > +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> > @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ thread apply [all | COUNT | -COUNT] [FLAG]... COMMAND
> >  * New native configurations
> >
> >  GNU/Linux/RISC-V             riscv*-*-linux*
> > +FreeBSD/riscv                        riscv*-*-freebsd*
>
> I just noticed that we write RISC-V in two different ways for GNU/Linux and
> FreeBSD: RISC-V and riscv.  It's not a big deal, but it looks a bit inconsistent.
>
> Otherwise everything looks good to me, but again I think the RISC-V ninjas should take a look.

RISC-V is the official spelling of the architecture name, and riscv is
what we use for configure triplets.  I try to use the official
spelling whenever possible which is why I used RISC-V here.

Jim

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/4] Initial support for FreeBSD/riscv
  - From: John Baldwin
- [PATCH v2 4/4] Add native target for FreeBSD/riscv.
  - From: John Baldwin
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add native target for FreeBSD/riscv.
  - From: Simon Marchi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]