This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Avoid find_thread_ptid with null_ptid
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
Pedro> This patch prepares for the change, by avoiding passing down null_ptid
Pedro> to find_thread_ptid or to functions that naturally use it
Should find_thread_ptid assert this?
Pedro> if (print_inferior_events)
Pedro> - printf_unfiltered (_("[New inferior %d (%s)]\n"),
Pedro> - inf->num,
Pedro> - target_pid_to_str (ptid_t (pid)));
Pedro> + {
Pedro> + if (pid != 0)
Pedro> + printf_unfiltered (_("[New inferior %d (%s)]\n"),
Pedro> + inf->num,
Pedro> + target_pid_to_str (ptid_t (pid)));
Pedro> + else
Pedro> + printf_unfiltered (_("[New inferior %d]\n"), inf->num);
I wonder if it is possible for an RSP implementation to say that the
inferior has PID 0.
Tom