This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] Fortran: Enable setting breakpoint on nested functions.
- From: Paweł Wódkowski <pwodkowski at pl dot sii dot eu>
- To: Richard Bunt <richard dot bunt at arm dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Michał Urbański <murbanski at pl dot sii dot eu>, Sebastian Basierski <sbasierski at pl dot sii dot eu>
- Cc: "tim dot wiederhake at intel dot com" <tim dot wiederhake at intel dot com>, "dragos dot carciumaru at intel dot com" <dragos dot carciumaru at intel dot com>, Bernhard Heckel <bernhard dot heckel at intel dot com>, nd <nd at arm dot com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 22:16:46 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] Fortran: Enable setting breakpoint on nested functions.
- References: <1542663530-140490-1-git-send-email-pwodkowski@pl.sii.eu> <1542663530-140490-5-git-send-email-pwodkowski@pl.sii.eu> <f349c0fd-ba61-c75d-d8d6-0d8dd907c8d4@arm.com>
Hi Richard,
Please see my comments.
On 28.11.2018 11:30, Richard Bunt wrote:
> Hi Pawel,
>
> Thanks for this fix, I have a local patch for this so I'd be pleased to see an upstream variant.
>
> Note: I cannot approve GDB patches but I thought I'd contribute a review since I was in this part
> of the code recently.
>
Any review is great, especially from someone else developping for
fortran these days ;)
> On 11/19/18 9:38 PM, Pawel Wodkowski wrote:
>> +# Test if we can set a breakpoint in a nested function
>> +gdb_breakpoint "sub_nested_outer"
>> +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "sub_nested_outer" ".*local_int = 19"
>>
>> # Test if we can access local and
>> # non-local variables defined one level up.
>> @@ -43,6 +46,10 @@ gdb_test "print local_int" "= 19" "print local_int in outer function"
>> gdb_test "up"
>> gdb_test "print index" "= 42" "print index at BP1, one frame up"
>>
>> +# Test if we can set a breakpoint in a nested function
>> +gdb_breakpoint "sub_nested_inner"
>> +gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "sub_nested_inner" ".*local_int = 17"
>> +
>> # Test if we can access local and
>> # non-local variables defined two level up.
>> gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "! BP_inner"]
>>
>
> This patch passed my local test case for this fix, so it looks good to me. The only test case that
> I have locally that I think would be of value here, would be to test that breakpoints can be set on
> multiple functions in the same contains block (i.e. both sub_nested_outer and sub_nested_inner),
> prior to program start. I found that such a test gives coverage to the changes in
> add_partial_subprogram as it tests the logic for subprograms which are linked as siblings.
>
> What do you think?
>
Yes, setting breakpoint before starting program is something that should
work for sure so I checked it. I'm happy to say that it is working for
both functions when set before MAIN__ :)
I will change the tests.
>> /* brobecker/2007-12-26: Normally, only "external" DIEs are part
>> of the global scope. But in Ada, we want to be able to access
>> @@ -9206,6 +9208,8 @@ add_partial_subprogram (struct partial_die_info *pdi,
>> {
>> if (pdi->tag == DW_TAG_entry_point)
>> add_partial_entry_point (pdi, lowpc, highpc, set_addrmap, cu);
>> + else if (pdi->tag == DW_TAG_subprogram)
>> + add_partial_subprogram (pdi, lowpc, highpc, set_addrmap, cu);
>> pdi = pdi->die_sibling;
>> }
>> }
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Rich
>
Pawel