This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] review request: implementing DW_AT_endianity
- From: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>
- To: Peeter Joot <peeter dot joot at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Peeter Joot <peeter dot joot at lzlabs dot com>, Simon Marchi <simark at simark dot ca>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:12:16 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] review request: implementing DW_AT_endianity
- References: <VI1PR0501MB286163B3EC58E11776F29D2A9C750@VI1PR0501MB2861.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20171010233010.58471-1-peeter.joot@lzlabs.com> <87371tq6uz.fsf@tromey.com> <CAJ4e__gakTnAPc9dN01EXF+pT43DMdZBJQKYNPYGra7RW5sAtQ@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>> "Peeter" == Peeter Joot <peeter.joot@gmail.com> writes:
Peeter> I'm still holding the patch for submission. I'd handled all the reviewer
Peeter> comments I received, implemented the tests suggestion by the reviewers, and
Peeter> verified that I introduced no test regressions. Also, the gcc side issues
Peeter> I noticed testing this are already fixed in the latest version (trunk, but
Peeter> perhaps one of the releases now too).
Peeter> Unfortunately, the FSF attribution required for me to submit this formally
Peeter> on behalf of the company I work for has been delayed repeatedly. The last
Peeter> I heard from the company lawyer who was arranging the attribution is that
Peeter> there's just a few more i's and t's to dot and cross, but it should be done
Peeter> soon.
Hi! What is the status of this? I'm still interested in getting this
patch into gdb.
thanks,
Tom