This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[committed][gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp with native-gdbserver


Committed as obvious.

Thanks,
- Tom

On 18-04-19 23:47, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When running gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp with native-gdbserver, we run into:
> ...
> FAIL: gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp: first: stepi 19
> ...
> due to the fact that we're trying to match:
> ...
> stepi 19^M
> 0x00007ffff7dd8b57 in _dl_start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2^M
> ...
> using pattern:
> ...
>   gdb_test "stepi 19" "0x.* in .* from target.*"
> ...
> 
> Fix this by changing the pattern to:
> ...
>   gdb_test "stepi 19" "0x.* in .* from .*"
> ...
> 
> Tested on x86_64-linux with native and native-gdbserver.
> 
> OK for trunk?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Tom
> 
> [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp with native-gdbserver
> 
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2019-04-18  Tom de Vries  <tdevries@suse.de>
> 
> 	PR gdb/24433
> 	* gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp: Fix stepi 19 pattern.
> 
> ---
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp
> index c4b41fc1bd..e791657e7a 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.btrace/reconnect.exp
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ gdb_target_cmd $gdbserver_protocol $gdbserver_gdbport
>  # Create a record, check, reconnect
>  with_test_prefix "first" {
>    gdb_test_no_output "record btrace" "record btrace enable"
> -  gdb_test "stepi 19" "0x.* in .* from target.*"
> +  gdb_test "stepi 19" "0x.* in .* from .*"
>  
>    gdb_test "info record" [multi_line \
>      "Active record target: .*" \
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]