This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA 1/2] Add completion for COMMAND in 'thread apply all|ID... COMMAND'

From: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>
To: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe dot waroquiers at skynet dot be>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:13:24 -0600
Subject: Re: [RFA 1/2] Add completion for COMMAND in 'thread apply all|ID... COMMAND'
References: <20190421134440.21100-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <20190421134440.21100-2-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <877ebidxff.fsf@tromey.com> <1556232239.22002.15.camel@skynet.be>

>>>>> "Philippe" == Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> writes:

>> One example is if the input text is "thread apply all -ascen".
>> It seems like this should complete to "-ascending " (with the trailing space).

Philippe> Currently, the unpatched GDB HEAD does not complete -ascen.
Philippe> I agree it should complete but it does not :(.
Philippe> (the GDB behaviour regarding command option syntax is wildly inconsistent).

Yeah, what I meant here is that it would be good if the new completion
code did this, not that this was something that currently occurred.

Tom

References:
- [RFA 0/2] Add completion for COMMAND for frame|thread apply
  - From: Philippe Waroquiers
- [RFA 1/2] Add completion for COMMAND in 'thread apply all|ID... COMMAND'
  - From: Philippe Waroquiers
- Re: [RFA 1/2] Add completion for COMMAND in 'thread apply all|ID... COMMAND'
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFA 1/2] Add completion for COMMAND in 'thread apply all|ID... COMMAND'
  - From: Philippe Waroquiers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]