This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gdb/171


The following reply was made to PR gdb/171; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: gdb/171
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 01:41:40 -0600

 Update: this bug is still present.  It happens with gcc-3.1.x, but not
 with gcc 2.95.3 or gcc 3.0.x.
 
 I tested with target i686-pc-linux-gnulibc2.2 (rh-7.2), host native.
 
 Test is gdb.base/corefile.exp: print func2::coremaker_local
 
 These configurations PASS:
 
   gdb-5.1.1, gcc-2.95.3, -gdwarf-2
   gdb-5.1.1, gcc-2.95.3, -gstabs+
   gdb-5.1.1, gcc-3.0.3, -gdwarf-2
   gdb-5.1.1, gcc-3.0.3, -gstabs+
   gdb-5.1.1, gcc-gcc-3_0-branch 2002-02-09, -gdwarf-2
   gdb-5.1.1, gcc-gcc-3_0-branch 2002-02-09, -gstabs+
   gdb-HEAD 2002-02-09, gcc-2.95.3, -gdwarf-2
   gdb-HEAD 2002-02-09, gcc-2.95.3, -gstabs+
   gdb-HEAD 2002-02-09, gcc-3.0.3, -gdwarf-2
   gdb-HEAD 2002-02-09, gcc-3.0.3, -gstabs+
   gdb-HEAD 2002-02-09, gcc-gcc-3_0-branch 2002-02-09, -gdwarf-2
   gdb-HEAD 2002-02-09, gcc-gcc-3_0-branch 2002-02-09, -gstabs+
 
 These configurations FAIL:
 
   gdb-5.1.1, gcc-HEAD 2002-02-09, -gdwarf-2
   gdb-5.1.1, gcc-HEAD 2002-02-09, -gstabs+
   gdb-HEAD 2002-02-09, gcc-HEAD 2002-02-09, -gdwarf-2
   gdb-HEAD 2002-02-09, gcc-HEAD 2002-02-09, -gstabs+
 
 The log file for the failing configurations still look like the log
 originally posted by Geoff.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]