Re: gdb/59: static members in a base class confuse gdb

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

The following reply was made to PR gdb/59; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Juergen Lindemeyer <Juergen.Lindemeyer@t-online.de>,
	gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: gdb/59: static members in a base class confuse gdb
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:29:55 -0400

 On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 07:08:00PM -0000, Juergen Lindemeyer wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR gdb/59; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Juergen.Lindemeyer@t-online.de (Juergen Lindemeyer)
 > To: nobody@sources.redhat.com, jdboyer@mediatrix.com,
 >  	gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com, gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
 > Cc:  
 > Subject: Re: gdb/59: static members in a base class confuse gdb
 > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:01:30 +0200
 > 
 >  http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=59
 >  
 >  Hi everybody,
 >  
 >  I don't know, who will receive this eMail (because I am unfamilar with
 >  this bug-tracking-system ...) so please be patient with me.
 >  
 >  It seams, that I have the same error (as gdb/59) on my box. I have the
 >  error with version 5.0 and version 5.2.1 (downloaded today). I also have
 >  seen the error-report gdb/709 that seams to be similar. I am very much
 >  interested in a fix for this problem. I also would like to know, if the
 >  other error is the same. I tried to patch my 5.2.1 with the given fix
 >  for 709, but that didn't change a thing (maybe this was a little dirty
 >  ... but I tried).
 >  
 >  Does anybody know, how I can reach "drow" who seams to be fixing 709.
 >  
 >  This problem is really very nasty and makes debugging very difficult for
 >  me.
 
 See:
   http://sources.redhat.com/gdb
 
 You want a more recent snapshot and the problem should be resolved.  If
 not, the smaller a test case you can give me, the better.
 
 -- 
 Daniel Jacobowitz
 MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer