This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
gdb/804: members of C++ classes are shadowed by static or global vars in the same file
- From: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu
- To: gdb-gnats at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 22 Oct 2002 21:22:45 -0000
- Subject: gdb/804: members of C++ classes are shadowed by static or global vars in the same file
- Reply-to: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu
>Number: 804
>Category: gdb
>Synopsis: members of C++ classes are shadowed by static or global vars in the same file
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Tue Oct 22 14:28:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: carlton@math.stanford.edu
>Release: GNU gdb 2002-10-11-cvs
>Organization:
>Environment:
Linux jackfruit.Stanford.EDU 2.4.18-5 #1 Mon Jun 10 15:31:48 EDT 2002 i686 unknown
gcc (GCC) 3.1
This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu".
>Description:
lookup_symbol_aux() searches the current block and all its
superblocks before doing the is_a_field_of_this stuff.
This means that, if a static or global variable from within the current file has the same name as a field of this, the former will erroneously be found instead of the latter.
>How-To-Repeat:
Compile the following:
#include <iostream>
class C
{
public:
C (int xval) : x(xval) {}
int x;
void marker () { std::cout << x; }
};
static int x = 0;
int main ()
{
C theC (1);
theC.marker ();
}
If you run it, it will print out '1'. But if you break on C::marker and print out x, GDB will claim that it's zero.
>Fix:
Tell lookup_symbol_aux not to read the static block until
after is_a_field_of_this has been taken care of. I'll
submit a fix once somebody approves my lookup_symbol_aux
refactoring.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: