This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
gdb/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
- From: mec at shout dot net
- To: gdb-gnats at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 30 Jan 2003 18:58:46 -0000
- Subject: gdb/979: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
- Reply-to: mec at shout dot net
>Number: 979
>Category: gdb
>Synopsis: Look into obsoleting i[3456]86-dg-dgux
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: maintenance
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Thu Jan 30 19:08:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: mec@shout.net
>Release: gdb 5.3
>Organization:
>Environment:
i[3456]86-dg-dgux
>Description:
gcc 3.2.1 obsoleted i[3456]86-dg-dgux
gcc gcc-3_3-branch%20030127 has removed dgux support
It might be okay to obsolete i[3456]86-dg-dgux in gdb.
Data General is a division of EMC now. I don't know if they still sell Unix servers and how active they are.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: