This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

varobj/1190: Typedef types are not displayed properly


>Number:         1190
>Category:       varobj
>Synopsis:       Typedef types are not displayed properly
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Apr 24 22:08:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     keiths at redhat dot com
>Release:        all
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:
get_type and get_target_type skip over TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF.
Consider:

typedef struct _foo Foo;
Foo foo;

The type for "foo" should b" "Foo", not "struct _foo". (Seems to work with non-struct/class typedefs.)
>How-To-Repeat:
Compile attachment. Run in Insight or under MI. Create varobjs for "foo" and "integer". The reported types should be "Foo" and "Integer", not "struct _foo" or "int". Ditto for the pointer types.
>Fix:
Make sure we're not skipping TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF and not calling CHECK_TYPEDEF for printing type info.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="typedefs.c"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="typedefs.c"

dHlwZWRlZiBpbnQgSW50ZWdlcjsKdHlwZWRlZiBzdHJ1Y3QgX2Zvbwp7CiAgICBpbnQgYTsKICAg
IGludCBiOwp9IEZvbzsKCmludAptYWluIChpbnQgYXJnYywgY2hhciAqYXJndltdKQp7CiAgICBG
b28gZm9vOwogICAgRm9vICpwX2ZvbzsKICAgIEludGVnZXIgaW50ZWdlcjsKICAgIEludGVnZXIg
KnBfaW50OwogICAgcmV0dXJuIDA7Cn0K


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]