This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb/1405
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 11 Oct 2003 20:08:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: gdb/1405
- Reply-to: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
The following reply was made to PR c++/1405; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: gdb/1405
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:06:54 -0400
gdb HEAD has improved.
With gdb HEAD 2003-10-10 15:27:10 UTC, this test PASSed with
some binutils and continued to FAIL with other binutils.
binutils 2.13.90.0.2-rh PASS
binutils 2.14 FAIL, virtual baseclass botch
binutils HEAD 2003-10-09 20:31:34 UTC PASS
I don't see any changes in c++ support lately. I suspect that
this is test is sensitive to dwarf-2 changes rather than c++ changes.
Remember, this problem happens only with gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2.
Michael C