This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb/2356: wrong listing of fsubp and fsubrp
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 6 Nov 2007 12:58:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: gdb/2356: wrong listing of fsubp and fsubrp
- Reply-to: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
The following reply was made to PR gdb/2356; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: danny_reeves@hotmail.com
Cc: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb/2356: wrong listing of fsubp and fsubrp
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 07:53:14 -0500
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 06:46:18AM -0000, danny_reeves@hotmail.com wrote:
> gdb outputs fsubrp when the opcode is for fsubp and fsubp is also
> reversed fsubp opcode produces an output of fsubrp in the code
> listing.
Does objdump show the same problem? If so, this bug is actually in
binutils.
A simple testcase would be appreciated, if you can supply one.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery