This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug breakpoints/9723] gdb core dumps on adding a breakpoint
- From: "pedro at codesourcery dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: 9 Jan 2009 20:48:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug breakpoints/9723] gdb core dumps on adding a breakpoint
- References: <20090109175536.9723.vaurora@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From pedro at codesourcery dot com 2009-01-09 20:48 -------
Subject: Re: gdb core dumps on adding a breakpoint
On Friday 09 January 2009 20:00:30, vaurora at redhat dot com wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From vaurora at redhat dot com 2009-01-09 20:00 -------
> I can't get the gdb-6.8.50.20090109 snapshot to compile:
>
> [val@clunky gdb-6.8.50.20090109]$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local
> [val@clunky gdb-6.8.50.20090109]$ make
> [...]
> gcc -g -O2 -I. -I.././gdb -I.././gdb/config
> -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/local/share/locale\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -I.././gdb/../include/opcode -I.././gdb/../readline/.. -I../bfd
> -I.././gdb/../bfd -I.././gdb/../include -I../libdecnumber
> -I.././gdb/../libdecnumber -I.././gdb/gnulib -Ignulib -DMI_OUT=1 -DTUI=1
> -Wall -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wpointer-arith -Wformat-nonliteral
> -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused -Wno-switch -Wno-char-subscripts -Werror -c -o
> coff-pe-read.o -MT coff-pe-read.o -MMD -MP -MF .deps/coff-pe-read.Tpo coff-pe-read.c
> coff-pe-read.c: In function ?read_pe_exported_syms?:
> coff-pe-read.c:226: error: expected ?)? before ?;? token
> coff-pe-read.c:358: error: expected ?;? before ?}? token
>
Oh, chucks, that made it to the last snapshot. Build errors are rare though. That's
been fixed in mainline already. You could try the version before that one, or
wait for a new snapshot, or just try vanilla gdb 6.8.
> If you can install the Fedora gdb rpm, you ought to have all the data necessary
> to reproduce it - core file and exact command sequence are included in the
> original report.
Right, but I also know that your employer has a several local changes in their
tree, over which we're not responsible for. If you can help with the triage, it
makes it much easier, and the end result being that you get a fixed gdb faster.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9723
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.