This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug breakpoints/12528] Should we handle constructors that aregarbage collected but their debug info isn't?
- From: "dje at google dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:12:05 +0000
- Subject: [Bug breakpoints/12528] Should we handle constructors that aregarbage collected but their debug info isn't?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-12528-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12528
dje at google dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppluzhnikov at google dot
| |com
--- Comment #1 from dje at google dot com 2011-03-11 08:11:32 UTC ---
*** Bug 12568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.