This is the mail archive of the gdb-prs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[Bug breakpoints/12528] Should we handle constructors that aregarbage collected but their debug info isn't?

From: "ppluzhnikov at google dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:22:39 +0000
Subject: [Bug breakpoints/12528] Should we handle constructors that aregarbage collected but their debug info isn't?
Auto-submitted: auto-generated
References: <bug-12528-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12528

Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov at google dot com> 2011-03-16 18:22:29 UTC ---
Verified original test case is fixed as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

References:
- [Bug breakpoints/12528] New: Should we handle constructors that aregarbage collected but their debug info isn't?
  - From: dje at google dot com

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]