This is the mail archive of the
gdb-testers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Sunday Project gdb test results, 2001-03-31
- To: gdb-testers at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Sunday Project gdb test results, 2001-03-31
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:28:27 -0800
Here are my Sunday Project results for 2001-03-31.
Red Hat Linux 6.2 native:
=== gdb Summary ===
# of ERRORs 0
# of WARNINGs 0
# of expected passes 6585
# of unexpected failures 119
# of unexpected successes 11
# of expected failures 183
# of untested testcases 19
Red Hat Linux 7.0 native:
=== gdb Summary ===
# of ERRORs 0
# of WARNINGs 0
# of expected passes 6635
# of unexpected failures 114
# of unexpected successes 11
# of expected failures 182
# of untested testcases 18
Solaris 2.5.1 native:
=== gdb Summary ===
# of ERRORs 4
# of WARNINGs 2
# of expected passes 6624
# of unexpected failures 103
# of unexpected successes 11
# of expected failures 155
# of unresolved testcases 34
# of untested testcases 19
I ran the tests with FSF gcc cvs gcc-3_0-branch 2001-03-31 and FSF gdb
cvs 2001-03-31. I counted the ERROR and WARNING lines by hand inspection
of the summary files.
All results are in Terf, http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gdb.cgi .
Note that Terf does not report ERRORs or WARNINGs. Also, Terf has
problems with duplicate test names.
The merged results for all platforms contain 4 ERRORs, 2 WARNINGs,
and 128 FAILs.
Here are the merged ERRORs categorized by test script:
4 TOTAL
= =====
4 gdb.c++/userdef.exp
Here are the merged WARNINGs categorized by test script:
2 TOTAL
= =====
2 gdb.c++/userdef.exp
Here are the merged FAILs categorized by test script:
128 TOTAL
=== =====
31 gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp
18 gdb.c++/classes.exp
11 gdb.base/callfwmall.exp
8 gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp
7 gdb.c++/templates.exp
6 gdb.c++/overload.exp
6 gdb.c++/inherit.exp
6 gdb.base/step-line.exp
5 gdb.c++/namespace.exp
4 gdb.c++/method.exp
4 gdb.c++/derivation.exp
3 gdb.threads/pthreads.exp
3 gdb.c++/local.exp
2 gdb.c++/annota2.exp
2 gdb.base/structs2.exp
2 gdb.base/selftest.exp
2 gdb.base/return2.exp
2 gdb.base/ending-run.exp
1 gdb.trace/packetlen.exp
1 gdb.stabs/weird.exp
1 gdb.java/jmisc.exp
1 gdb.c++/userdef.exp
1 gdb.c++/demangle.exp
1 gdb.base/exprs.exp
Changes from 2001-03-24:
2001-03-24 total 4 ERRORs
gdb.c++/userdef.exp -4 ERRORs g++ bug fixed
gdb.c++/userdef.exp +4 ERRORs new g++ bug
2001-03-31 total 4 ERRORs
2001-03-24 total 2 WARNINGs
gdb.c++/userdef.exp -2 WARNINGs g++ bug fixed
gdb.c++/userdef.exp +2 WARNINGs new g++ bug
2001-03-31 total 2 WARNINGs
2001-03-24 total 120 FAILs
gdb.base/step-line.exp +6 FAILs new test script
gdb.c++/userdef.exp +1 FAILs was ERROR -- g++ bug fixed
gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp +1 FAILs was ERROR -- g++ bug fixed
2001-03-31 total 128 FAILs
Last week's g++ compiler bug has been fixed. This shifts some ERRORs and
WARNINGs back to FAILs on some platforms (userdef.exp and virtfunc.exp).
There is a new g++ compilation failure this week. The new bug appears
on Solaris 2.5.1, but not on Red Hat Linux 6.2 or Red Hat Linux 7.
I will investigate this. The error messages are:
horton/chastain/fsf/2001-03-31/source/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/sbuf_iter.h:102: undefined reference to `std::errno'
/horton/chastain/fsf/2001-03-31/source/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/sbuf_iter.h:102: undefined reference to `std::errno'
/horton/chastain/fsf/2001-03-31/source/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/sbuf_iter.h:102: undefined reference to `std::errno'
/horton/chastain/fsf/2001-03-31/source/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/sbuf_iter.h:102: undefined reference to `std::errno'
...
There is a new test script this week, gdb.base/step-line.exp, and it brings
some new FAILs (which means that the script is doing its job). I will file
a PR.