This is the mail archive of the gdb-testers@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[binutils-gdb/gdb-8.1-branch] Fix gdb.ada/bp_c_mixed_case.exp (PR gdb/22670)


*** TEST RESULTS FOR COMMIT bd140f1f5ef06b801156c787331f2d3ad72320a1 ***

Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Branch: gdb-8.1-branch
Commit: bd140f1f5ef06b801156c787331f2d3ad72320a1

Fix gdb.ada/bp_c_mixed_case.exp (PR gdb/22670)

The problem here is that we are using the user-provided lookup name
literally for name comparisons.  I.e., "<MixedCase>" with the "<>"s
included.

This commit fixes the minsym lookup case.  psymbol/symbol lookup will
be fixed in a follow up.

In the minsym case, we're using using the user-provided lookup name
literally for linkage name comparisons.  That obviously can't work
since the "<>" are not really part of the linkage name.

The original idea was that we'd use the symbol's language to select
the right symbol name matching algorithm, but that doesn't work for
Ada because it's not really possible to unambiguously tell from the
linkage name alone whether we're dealing with Ada symbols, so Ada
minsyms end up with no language set, or sometimes C++ set.

So fix this by treating Ada mode specially when determining the
linkage name to match against.

gdb/ChangeLog:
2018-01-10  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/22670
	* minsyms.c (linkage_name_str): New function.
	(iterate_over_minimal_symbols): Use it.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-01-10  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/22670
	* gdb.ada/bp_c_mixed_case.exp: Remove setup_kfail calls.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]