This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project. See the GDB home page for more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> To those folks I believe we can say "use GCC". Are there any other platforms that > would be adversely affected? Are there any other bad consequences to > changing the standard? [I think this point was brought up, but I don't remember the resolution.] How does this effect three-staging the tool-chain? I.e. traditionally, we would first build the tool-chain with the "system" compiler, then re-build everything with the newly-built gcc, then re-build with the still newer gcc (and verify that the last two were identical). It is persumably simple enough to just leave gdb out of the first stage, if we don't already do that, but of course note we cannot leave bfd or binutils out of the first statge. But has this change been blessed by releng? --Per