This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: wrong htons() used?

To: "J.T. Conklin" <jtc at redback dot com>
Subject: Re: wrong htons() used?
From: Grant Edwards <grante at visi dot com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 10:43:18 -0500
Cc: Grant dot Edwards at comtrol dot com, gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <19991021151610.A3919@comtrol.com> <380F80F1.394F7493@netwinder.org> <19991021162144.A15266@comtrol.com> <380FB0FC.A5CE946F@cygnus.com> <19991022085150.A26689@comtrol.com> <3810789A.EE0C01AC@netwinder.org> <19991022095507.A4048@visi.com> <5maepbh1qs.fsf@jtc.redbacknetworks.com> <19991022101623.B4852@visi.com>


> Neither __BIG_ENDIAN nor __LITTLE_ENDIAN is defined, since the file
> rdi-share/endian.h is shadowing /usr/include/endian.h.  I think that
> this means things default to BIG_ENDIAN behavior.
> 
> I thing the best option is to rename rdi-share/endian.h so that it
> doesn't shadow /usr/include/endian.h.  rdi-share/endian.h appears to
> be some strictly local stuff and not intented as a replacement for
> /usr/include/endian.h.

I renamed rdi-share/endian.h and everything works much better now.  I get
the feeling that not too many people are using this target.  :)

-- 
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com

References:
- wrong htons() used?
  - From: Grant.Edwards
- Re: wrong htons() used?
  - From: Scott Bambrough
- Re: wrong htons() used?
  - From: Grant.Edwards
- Re: wrong htons() used?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: wrong htons() used?
  - From: Grant.Edwards
- Re: wrong htons() used?
  - From: Scott Bambrough
- Re: wrong htons() used?
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: wrong htons() used?
  - From: J.T. Conklin
- Re: wrong htons() used?
  - From: Grant Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]