This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Suggested (easier) fix to ... RE: Regressions problem (200 fa ilures)
- To: Donn Terry <donnte at microsoft dot com>
- Subject: Re: Suggested (easier) fix to ... RE: Regressions problem (200 fa ilures)
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 13:09:36 -0700
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl, Peter dot Schauer at Regent dot E-Technik dot TU-Muenchen dot DE, kingdon at redhat dot com, gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <309F4FC4705DC844987051A517E9E39B16EEF9@red-pt-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 11:43:37AM -0700, Donn Terry wrote:
> In the .s, there's a .stabn at the beginning of the function, and
> another immediately after the call to __main. Gdb knows to ignore
> the first one, so that's exactly what's wanted. (And gdb does
> the right thing in the simple testcase.)
As the patch also cures some minor warts in debugging on Alpha,
I've gone ahead and committed it. If it turns out to need
further tweeking, we can address that then.
r~