This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: That vision thing ...
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: That vision thing ...
- From: Quality Quorum <qqi at world dot std dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:00:32 -0400 (EDT)
- cc: GDB Discussion <gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> (If you know something about Australian politics ``The Vision Thing'' is
> a backhanded slap at someone that that has no sense of vision :-)
>
> Hello,
>
> For the curious :-) Where next.
>
> Firstly, there is always the ongoing and important need to improve
> things like language support (namely C++), symbol-table performance,
> native threads, code cleanups, bug fixes and the like. I believe that
> that there is now plenty active and ongoing development in these area.
> Me giving opinions on it would just be distracting.
>
> I also think that these ongoing developments are going to be the
> principal factors that determine the time frame for each succeeding GDB
> release. They are also the things that attract the most attention and
> also get the most praise :-)
>
> Longer term I can see two significant developments:
>
> o libgdb
>
> The basic motivation is the desire
> to make it easier (and more robust) to
> integrate GDB into a GUI.
>
> Here the first step is MI (along with
> ui-out/ui-file).
>
> o multi-arch et al.
>
> Here the objective is to remove
> the assumption that GDB has, at any
> time, just one thread/language/isa
> /abi/vm/target/.... The motivation
> being to make it possible for GDB to
> handle complex targets that contain
> multiple architectures and the like.
>
> Here that first step is multi-arch.
>
> So?
>
> I'd just like to encourage people to pursue what they are currently
> working on. Just keep in mind that there is likely to be more
> significant change (especially through multi-arch) lurking in the
> background. For my part I hope to be concentrating on mult-arch et al,
> however, I will most likely occasionally prod libgdb.
>
> As with any bit of open source, there is of course, no timeframe ...
>
> Comments, fits of laughter, ...
Can we split target depended pieces into subdirs under gdb ?
>
> Andrew
>
Thanks,
Aleksey