This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Renaming insight to `insight'

To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
Subject: Re: Renaming insight to `insight'
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 08 Dec 2000 10:45:57 -0700
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <873dfzddwd.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <9003-Fri08Dec2000082500+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <87hf4f8i3t.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <1438-Fri08Dec2000095645+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

Eli> I consider that a bug in the current version of the manual.  I
Eli> think it should say which one of -w and -nw is the default.

I agree that is a bug.  However, I don't plan to fix it.

>> Also, insight isn't part of gdb, so additions there aren't
>> necessary.

Eli> The change we are talking about is for top.c in the GDB
Eli> distribution, no?  So it _is_ relevant for GDB, I think.

This change has no effect observable by anyone running the official
GNU gdb distribution.  The official GNU gdb doesn't include a GUI.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Renaming insight to `insight'
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- Renaming insight to `insight'
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Renaming insight to `insight'
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Renaming insight to `insight'
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Renaming insight to `insight'
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]